133 Blackstock Road v Assethold Limited

Ficha del Equipo Editorial a partir de la base mundial AI Hallucination Cases de Damien Charlotin. Verifica siempre en la fuente original.

El 17 de noviembre de 2025, First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) (Reino Unido) conoció un asunto en el que un abogado se apoyó en una herramienta de IA generativa (no identificada en la decisión) y el expediente registró contenido alucinado.

Qué se alucinó

• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Respondent relied on Gala Unity Ltd v Ariadne Road RTM Co Ltd [2012] UKUT 366 (LC); Tribunal could not find this authority and directed the Respondent to produce it; none was provided and Tribunal concluded it apparently does not exist.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Respondent subsequently cited Gala Unity Ltd v Ariadne Road RTM Co Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 1372, but the Court of Appeal decision concerned a different issue (management of separate properties) and did not support the Respondent's proposition about retained insurance rights.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Respondent relied on Qdime Ltd v Bath Building (Swindon) Management Co Ltd [2014] UKUT 0261 (LC) as supporting the proposition that lease terms prevail over RTM management functions; Tribunal found the case existed but did not involve RTM and did not support that proposition.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Respondent cited A1 Properties (Sunderland) Ltd v Tudor Studios RTM Company Ltd [2024] UKSC 27 as confirming that RTM rights do not override express lease provisions; Tribunal found the Supreme Court decision concerned a failure to serve a claim notice and did not establish the principle asserted.

Desenlace

Show Cause. Sanción económica: 1. Sanción profesional: No.

Ficha del caso

Fuentes: aporte de https://naturalandartificiallaw.com/thirty-uk-hallucinated-citations/#Hassan_v_ABC_International_Bank_PLC; base de datos de Damien Charlotin.

¿Conoces un caso que falte, o uno colombiano que debamos cubrir a fondo? Escríbenos.