14095863 Canada Inc. v Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Co.

Ficha del Equipo Editorial a partir de la base mundial AI Hallucination Cases de Damien Charlotin. Verifica siempre en la fuente original.

El 17 de febrero de 2026, Canadian IPO (Canadá) conoció un asunto en el que una parte sin abogado (litigante pro se) se apoyó en una herramienta de IA generativa (no identificada en la decisión) y el expediente registró contenido alucinado.

Qué se alucinó

• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Registrar identified multiple cited cases that do not appear to exist in the Requesting Party's written representations and flagged them as fabricated; Registrar noted these appeared across several paragraphs and undermined the submissions.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Registrar found several purported quotations in paras 71–75 that appear to be completely fabricated and thus not attributable to any real authority; Registrar treated them as fabricated quotations undermining the submission's reliability.
• Tergiversación de norma legal. Registrar noted inaccurate quotations/misquotations of the Trademarks Act (inserting 'and services' where only 'goods' appeared) and misquotations of case law in multiple paragraphs; these misrepresentations were identified and criticized.
• Tergiversación de pruebas o escritos. Registrar observed references to non-existent exhibits and allegations that the Owner fabricated portions of its evidence; Registrar rejected these assertions as baseless given the Requesting Party's own fabricated citations and quotations.

Desenlace

Sanción profesional: No.

Ficha del caso

Fuentes: aporte de /documents/1706/14095863-Canada-Inc.-v-Abercrombie-Fitch-Trading-Co.-2026-TMOB-28-compressed.pdf; base de datos de Damien Charlotin.

¿Conoces un caso que falte, o uno colombiano que debamos cubrir a fondo? Escríbenos.