Abybatou Mbow v. Officer Michael Mackert et al.
D. Maryland · Estados Unidos, 28 de enero de 2026 · Fabricación. Ficha verificada del Equipo Editorial.
Ficha del Equipo Editorial a partir de la base mundial AI Hallucination Cases de Damien Charlotin. Verifica siempre en la fuente original.
El 28 de enero de 2026, D. Maryland (Estados Unidos) conoció un asunto en el que un abogado se apoyó en una herramienta de IA generativa (no identificada en la decisión) y el expediente registró contenido alucinado.
Qué se alucinó
- Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Counsel cited a non-existent decision as "Bush v. Lucas, 598 F. Supp. 3d 303, 316 (D. Md. 2022)"; Court found no such case at that citation and noted the closest match is a different 5th Circuit opinion.
- Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Counsel quoted language attributed to Okwa v. Harper that does not appear in that opinion; Court observed the quoted language is absent from Okwa.
- Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Counsel cited Haines v. Vogel as supporting that non-consensual sexualized photography during arrest is "outrageous," but Court found Haines did not involve an arrest or sexualized photography and dismissed the asserted support.
- Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Counsel cited "Md. Comm'n on Hum. Rels. v. Balt. Cty., 439 A.2d 1121 (Md. 1982)" for a proposition; Court identified the reporter information corresponds to Fields v. State, 439 A.2d 1121 (1982), not the named case.
- Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Counsel cited "Eichholz v. Camp, 36 F.4th 908, 917 (4th Cir. 2022)"; Court noted the reporter information more closely matches an unrelated Ninth Circuit opinion and the citation is inaccurate.
- Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Counsel cited Holloway v. State, 232 Md. App. 272, 290 (2017) with a pinpoint page that does not exist (opinion ends at p.285) and relied on it for an unrelated proposition; Court noted the page and proposition are incorrect.
- Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Counsel mis-summarized or misquoted multiple Fourth Circuit cases (e.g., misquoting Colleton Preparatory Acad. and United States v. Moradi); Court flagged these misquotes in its opinion.
Desenlace
Order to Show Cause. Sanción profesional: No.
Ficha del caso
| Caso | Abybatou Mbow v. Officer Michael Mackert et al. |
| Jurisdicción | D. Maryland |
| País | Estados Unidos |
| Fecha | 28 de enero de 2026 |
| Quién usó IA | Lawyer |
| Herramienta | Implied |
| Área del derecho | civil rights |
Fuentes: aporte de /documents/1420/Mbow_v._Mackert_USA_28_January_2026.pdf; base de datos de Damien Charlotin.
¿Conoces un caso que falte, o uno colombiano que debamos cubrir a fondo? Escríbenos.