Advani v. Appellate Term
S.D. New York · Estados Unidos, 1 de agosto de 2025 · Fabricación. Ficha verificada del Equipo Editorial.
Ficha del Equipo Editorial a partir de la base mundial AI Hallucination Cases de Damien Charlotin. Verifica siempre en la fuente original.
El 1 de agosto de 2025, S.D. New York (Estados Unidos) conoció un asunto en el que una parte sin abogado (litigante pro se) se apoyó en una herramienta de IA generativa (no identificada en la decisión) y el expediente registró contenido alucinado.
Qué se alucinó
- Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Nonexistent case cited in Plaintiff's Opposition: 'Doe v. Jindal, No. 11-388, 2011 WL 3664490, at *3 (E.D. La. Aug. 19, 2011)' (Pl.'s Opp'n 12); the Court found it does not exist.
- Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Nonexistent case cited in Plaintiff's Opposition: 'Matter of Medical Transport v NY State Dept of Health, 294 A.D.2d 574 (2d Dept 2002)' (Pl.'s Opp'n 28); the Court found it does not exist.
- Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Nonexistent case cited in Plaintiff's Sur-Reply: 'Parker v. Blauvelt Volunteer Fire Co., 93 F.3d 65, 69 (2d Cir. 1996)' (Pl.'s Sur-Reply 4); the Court found it does not exist.
- Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Nonexistent case cited in Plaintiff's Sur-Reply: 'Guggenheimer v. Ginzburg, 43 F.3d 807, 812 (3d Cir. 1994)' (Pl.'s Sur-Reply 4); the Court found it does not exist.
- Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Quotation in Plaintiff's Opposition at page 9 does not appear in the case cited, per the Court.
- Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Quotation in Plaintiff's Opposition at page 12 does not appear in the case cited, per the Court.
- Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Quotation in Plaintiff's Opposition at page 28 does not appear in the case cited, per the Court.
- Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Plaintiff's citation at page 14 of her Opposition does not support the proposition for which it is cited, per the Court.
- Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Plaintiff's citation at page 16 of her Opposition does not support the proposition for which it is cited, per the Court.
- Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Plaintiff's citation at page 17 of her Opposition does not support the proposition for which it is cited, per the Court.
- Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Plaintiff's citation at page 18 of her Opposition does not support the proposition for which it is cited, per the Court.
- Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Plaintiff's citation at page 23 of her Opposition does not support the proposition for which it is cited, per the Court.
- Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Plaintiff's citation at page 28 of her Opposition does not support the proposition for which it is cited, per the Court.
Desenlace
Warning. Sanción profesional: No.
Ficha del caso
| Caso | Advani v. Appellate Term |
| Jurisdicción | S.D. New York |
| País | Estados Unidos |
| Fecha | 1 de agosto de 2025 |
| Quién usó IA | Pro Se Litigant |
| Herramienta | Implied |
| Área del derecho | civil rights |
Fuentes: aporte de /documents/694/Advani_v_Appellate_Term_2nd_Judicial_Department.pdf; base de datos de Damien Charlotin.
¿Conoces un caso que falte, o uno colombiano que debamos cubrir a fondo? Escríbenos.