Al-Hamim v. Star Hearthstone

Ficha del Equipo Editorial a partir de la base mundial AI Hallucination Cases de Damien Charlotin. Verifica siempre en la fuente original.

El 26 de diciembre de 2024, Colorado (Estados Unidos) conoció un asunto en el que una parte sin abogado (litigante pro se) se apoyó en una IA generativa no identificada y el expediente registró contenido alucinado.

Qué se alucinó

• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Appellant cited a non-existent case; the court could not locate it and appellant later admitted it was a GAI hallucination.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Appellant cited a non-existent case; the court could not locate it and appellant later admitted it was a GAI hallucination.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Appellant cited a non-existent case; the court could not locate it and appellant later admitted it was a GAI hallucination.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Appellant cited a non-existent case; the court could not locate it and appellant later admitted it was a GAI hallucination.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Appellant cited a non-existent case; the court could not locate it and appellant later admitted it was a GAI hallucination.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Appellant cited a non-existent case; the court could not locate it and appellant later admitted it was a GAI hallucination.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Appellant cited a non-existent case; the court could not locate it and appellant later admitted it was a GAI hallucination.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Appellant cited a non-existent case; the court could not locate it and appellant later admitted it was a GAI hallucination.

Desenlace

No Sanction (due to pro se, contrition, etc.); Warning of future sanctions.. Sanción profesional: No.

Ficha del caso

Fuentes: aporte de https://www.coloradojudicial.gov/system/files/opinions-2024-12/24CA0190-PD.pdf; base de datos de Damien Charlotin.

¿Conoces un caso que falte, o uno colombiano que debamos cubrir a fondo? Escríbenos.