Alana Kotler v Ontario Secondary School Teachers’ Federation

Ficha del Equipo Editorial a partir de la base mundial AI Hallucination Cases de Damien Charlotin. Verifica siempre en la fuente original.

El 29 de agosto de 2025, Ontario Labour Relations Board (Canadá) conoció un asunto en el que una parte sin abogado (litigante pro se) se apoyó en una herramienta de IA generativa (no identificada en la decisión) y el expediente registró contenido alucinado.

Qué se alucinó

• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Case cited by applicant could not be located by the Board or OSSTF as cited.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Applicant relied on Micheal Lind v. International Alliance...; the Board located a decision with the same locator but it is a brief procedural decision that does not support the proposition relied upon by the applicant (misrepresented).
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Case cited by applicant could not be located by the Board or OSSTF as cited.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Case cited by applicant could not be located by the Board or OSSTF as cited.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Case cited by applicant could not be located by the Board or OSSTF as cited.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Case cited by applicant could not be located by the Board or OSSTF as cited.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Case cited by applicant could not be located by the Board or OSSTF as cited (Latreille appears again in another citation form).
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Case cited by applicant could not be located by the Board or OSSTF as cited (Hargrave variant cited by applicant not located).
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Case cited by applicant could not be located by the Board or OSSTF as cited.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Case cited by applicant could not be located by the Board or OSSTF as cited (external tribunal decisions cited but not located).
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Case cited by applicant could not be located by the Board or OSSTF as cited (external tribunal decision cited but not located).
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Case cited by applicant could not be located by the Board or OSSTF as cited.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Case cited by applicant could not be located by the Board or OSSTF as cited (board could not locate the Millen decision as cited).
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Unreported decision cited by applicant that the Board could not locate as cited.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Recent external decision cited by applicant that the Board and OSSTF could not locate as cited.

Desenlace

Arguments ignored. Sanción profesional: No.

Ficha del caso

Fuentes: aporte de /documents/974/2025canlii96840_NRiY2XS.pdf; base de datos de Damien Charlotin.

¿Conoces un caso que falte, o uno colombiano que debamos cubrir a fondo? Escríbenos.