Andrea K. Tantaros v. Fox News Network, LLC, et al.
S.D. New York · Estados Unidos, 27 de marzo de 2026 · Fabricación. Ficha verificada del Equipo Editorial.
Ficha del Equipo Editorial a partir de la base mundial AI Hallucination Cases de Damien Charlotin. Verifica siempre en la fuente original.
El 27 de marzo de 2026, S.D. New York (Estados Unidos) conoció un asunto en el que una parte sin abogado (litigante pro se) se apoyó en una herramienta de IA generativa (no identificada en la decisión) y el expediente registró contenido alucinado.
Qué se alucinó
- Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Plaintiff cited 'Roe v. Bernabei & Katz, PLLC, 314 F. Supp. 3d 200,209 (D.D.C. 2018)' as analogous authority; Court identified this citation as inaccurate/non-existent.
- Fabricación de jurisprudencia. In the sur-reply, plaintiff inaccurately cited 'Torres v. City of New York, No. 20-CV-3384, 2021 WL 3725985, at 8 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 23, 2021)' for the proposition that words and threats can constitute actionable violence; Court marked the citation inaccurate.
- Fabricación de norma legal. Plaintiff quoted non-existent statutory language in the GMVA, asserting it 'expressly applies to' assault, sexual misconduct, sexual abuse, and other forms of gender-based violence; Court found the quoted statutory language non-existent.
- Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Plaintiff cited a non-existent case 'M.D. v. New York State Off For People with Developmental Disabilities, 2023 WL 3404357, at *10 (S.D.N.Y. 2023)' to support that verbal, psychological, and physical abuse are actionable under the GMVA; Court identified it as non-existent/inaccurate.
- Fabricación de jurisprudencia. In her sur-reply, plaintiff inaccurately cited 'Garcia v. Comprehensive Ctr., LLC, No. 21-CV-6945, 2022 WL 2237452, at 4-5 (S.D.N.Y. June 22, 2022)'; Court found the citation inaccurate.
- Fabricación de norma legal. Quoted non-existent statutory language attributed to the GMVA; court found the quoted language does not appear in the statute.
- Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Cited a non-existent case presented as supporting that verbal, psychological, and physical abuse are actionable under the GMVA.
- Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Attributed a quoted holding to Roe in support of coverage for 'harassing comments, threats, and gestures of a sexual nature'—court flagged as an inaccurate citation/quotation in the filing.
- Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Cited Garcia v. Comprehensive Ctr., LLC with specific pages and holdings as support for physical and verbal acts being covered—court identified the citation as inaccurate.
- Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Cited Torres v. City of New York for the proposition that words and threats can constitute actionable violence; court identified the citation as inaccurate in the filing.
Desenlace
Warning. Sanción profesional: No.
Ficha del caso
| Caso | Andrea K. Tantaros v. Fox News Network, LLC, et al. |
| Jurisdicción | S.D. New York |
| País | Estados Unidos |
| Fecha | 27 de marzo de 2026 |
| Quién usó IA | Pro Se Litigant |
| Herramienta | Implied |
Fuentes: aporte de https://reason.com/volokh/2026/03/29/former-fox-commentator-andrea-tantaross-court-filings-contained-inaccurate-citations-court-suspects-ai-hallucinations/; base de datos de Damien Charlotin.
¿Conoces un caso que falte, o uno colombiano que debamos cubrir a fondo? Escríbenos.