Appeals of Huffman Construction, LLC

Ficha del Equipo Editorial a partir de la base mundial AI Hallucination Cases de Damien Charlotin. Verifica siempre en la fuente original.

El 23 de octubre de 2025, Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (Estados Unidos) conoció un asunto en el que un abogado se apoyó en una IA generativa no identificada y el expediente registró contenido alucinado.

Qué se alucinó

• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Cited a non-existent ASBCA decision and incorrect reporter pin (case not found and reporter entry refers to a different appeal). Board could not find ASBCA No. 29708 as cited.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Cited a case name that does not correspond to the reporter entry and appears not to exist in ASBCA decisions identified by the Board.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Cited Grumman Aerospace with an incorrect reporter citation and relied on the citation for a proposition not supported by the actual decisions the Board located.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Relied on a reporter entry and ASBCA reference that did not support the asserted rule; Board found the cited reporter entry involved different parties/subjects.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Cited a reporter entry and case (Env’t Safety Consultants) that either was the wrong reporter or did not support the claimed legal proposition.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Cited a federal appellate decision for a proposition about burden shifting though the cited page discusses a different doctrine; the case did not support the claimed rule.
• Tergiversación de pruebas o escritos. Cited transcript pages as containing expert testimony that the Board found were testimony of a different witness and did not support the asserted facts.
• Tergiversación de pruebas o escritos. Cited transcript pages as supporting factual assertions, but the cited pages discuss unrelated topics; Board found the transcript did not contain the alleged testimony.
• Fabricación de pruebas o escritos. Cited non-existent transcript pages (pages contain reporter certificates or are beyond transcript length) to support factual claims.
• Fabricación de pruebas o escritos. Cited transcript pages that do not exist (volume ends earlier) to attribute concessions to the contracting officer; Board noted the pages cited were beyond the transcript's length.

Desenlace

Reply brief struck in its entirety. Sanción profesional: No.

Ficha del caso

Fuentes: aporte de /documents/1040/Huffman_Construction_LLC_Hamady_10.23.25_Non-Disp_Decision.pdf; base de datos de Damien Charlotin.

¿Conoces un caso que falte, o uno colombiano que debamos cubrir a fondo? Escríbenos.