Braica v. Frankowski (Anthony Braica v. Tom Frankowski)

Ficha del Equipo Editorial a partir de la base mundial AI Hallucination Cases de Damien Charlotin. Verifica siempre en la fuente original.

El 15 de diciembre de 2025, D. Connecticut (Estados Unidos) conoció un asunto en el que una parte sin abogado (litigante pro se) se apoyó en una herramienta de IA generativa (no identificada en la decisión) y el expediente registró contenido alucinado.

Qué se alucinó

• Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Plaintiff attributed a wholly fabricated quotation to this real case.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Case cited to support Eighth Amendment application to probationers though Solem concerned incarceration and is not relevant here.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Cited to support Eighth Amendment argument despite Graham involving incarceration rather than probation.
• Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Plaintiff misattributed a quotation to Moore and cited it in support of an Eighth Amendment argument though Moore addresses a Fourth Amendment apartment-search context.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Cited Rochin to support an Eighth Amendment 'shocks the conscience' argument though Rochin concerns due process (Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments) and is not on point.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Plaintiff relied on Steffel but that case addresses First and Fourteenth Amendment issues, not the Eighth.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Misstated the holding; Jones concerns GPS attachment to a vehicle, not to a person as plaintiff asserted.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Cited Hamilton for a sovereign-immunity point but failed to note Hamilton dismissed negligence claims as barred by sovereign immunity.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Entirely fabricated case; plaintiff supplied a citation string that corresponds to different cases with different names.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Cited Fuller to suggest probationers have Eighth Amendment protections relevant here, but the case concerns prison housing classification and is not on point.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Entirely fabricated case; the plaintiff cited 'State v. Kelleher' with citations that lead to unrelated real cases.
• Información desactualizada de jurisprudencia revocada. Cited Quon without disclosing that the Ninth Circuit decision was explicitly reversed and remanded by the Supreme Court.

Desenlace

Briefs struck; warning. Sanción profesional: No.

Ficha del caso

Fuentes: aporte de /documents/1198/Braica_v._Frankowski_USA_15_December_2025.pdf; base de datos de Damien Charlotin.

¿Conoces un caso que falte, o uno colombiano que debamos cubrir a fondo? Escríbenos.