Charles C. Force v. Capital One, N.A., et al.

Ficha del Equipo Editorial a partir de la base mundial AI Hallucination Cases de Damien Charlotin. Verifica siempre en la fuente original.

El 15 de octubre de 2025, M.D. Florida (Estados Unidos) conoció un asunto en el que una parte sin abogado (litigante pro se) se apoyó en una herramienta de IA generativa (no identificada en la decisión) y el expediente registró contenido alucinado.

Qué se alucinó

• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Plaintiff cited Graves v. Smith's Transfer Corp., 736 F.2d 819, 820 (1st Cir. 1984) for a proposition the case does not hold; the Court found the case does not discuss the asserted point.
• Información desactualizada de jurisprudencia revocada. Plaintiff relied on Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 236 (1974) to state the old 'no set of facts' pleading standard, but the Court noted that the standard was retired by Bell Atlantic v. Twombly (2007).
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Plaintiff cited Phillips v. Phillips, 685 So. 2d 85 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996), but the Southern Second citation corresponds to Lowe Inv. Corp. v. Clemente, 685 So. 2d 84; the named Phillips opinion did not exist at that citation.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Plaintiff cited Brydger v. Brydger, 910 So. 2d 381 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005), but the Southern Second citation corresponds to Whitley v. Royal Trails Prop. Owners' Ass'n, Inc., 910 So. 2d 381; the named Brydger citation was incorrect.
• Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Plaintiff attributed a specific quoted phrase to U.S. v. Int'l Brotherhood of Teamsters, 266 F.3d 45 (2d Cir. 2001), but the Court found no such quote in that opinion.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Plaintiff cited a non-existent case captioned Ashley v. Bank of Am., 538 F. App'x 874; the cited Federal Appendix citation did not correspond to that caption.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Plaintiff cited an advisory opinion captioned In re Advisory Opinion to the Governor re: Dual Representation of State Officers, 630 So. 2d 1055 (Fla. 1994) and attributed holdings about the Attorney General that the opinion does not contain; the citation and summary were misleading.

Desenlace

Filings stricken; Show Cause Order. Sanción profesional: No.

Ficha del caso

Fuentes: aporte de /documents/875/Force_v._Capital_One_USA_15_October_2025.pdf; base de datos de Damien Charlotin.

¿Conoces un caso que falte, o uno colombiano que debamos cubrir a fondo? Escríbenos.