Chelsea Montes v. Suns Legacy Partners LLC

Ficha del Equipo Editorial a partir de la base mundial AI Hallucination Cases de Damien Charlotin. Verifica siempre en la fuente original.

El 31 de marzo de 2026, D. Arizona (Estados Unidos) conoció un asunto en el que un abogado se apoyó en una herramienta de IA generativa (no identificada en la decisión) y el expediente registró contenido alucinado.

Qué se alucinó

• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Response to motion to dismiss included 'McIntyre v. Phx. Newspapers, Inc.' citation that was fabricated/mis-cited as filed.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Reply in support of anonymity contained multiple 'Doe v. ...' citations (e.g., Amazon) presented with Westlaw/West reporter info that did not exist as cited and were removed or corrected.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Reply included 'Doe v. Maricopa County Community College District, 2017 WL 4460441 (D. Ariz. Oct. 5, 2017)' that counsel could not identify as a real corresponding opinion; court treated it as fabricated.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Reply cited 'Doe v. Northrop Grumman Sys. Corp., 2022 WL 3447983 (E.D. Va. Aug. 17, 2022)' as authority; court found the citation was misreferenced/ fabricated as used.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Initial complaint cited a non-existent case and parenthetical about Equal Pay Act plausibility; court found the citation fictitious.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Response to motion to dismiss cited 'Pizzo v. City of Chandler' as a 2021 D. Ariz. opinion; court determined the citation was fabricated as presented.
• Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Filings contained quoted phrases attributed to Ahanchian that did not appear verbatim in the opinion; court found they were paraphrased or presented as false quotations.
• Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Filings included fabricated/direct-quotation-style phrases attributed to other real cases (e.g., Briones, Sibley, Valley Eng'rs) that were not direct quotes in those opinions.

Desenlace

Adverse Costs Order; CLE; Notification. Sanción profesional: No.

Ficha del caso

Fuentes: aporte de /documents/1872/Montes_v._Suns_Legacy_Partners_USA_31_March_2026.pdf; base de datos de Damien Charlotin.

¿Conoces un caso que falte, o uno colombiano que debamos cubrir a fondo? Escríbenos.