Chenco v. Do-Fluoride

Ficha del Equipo Editorial a partir de la base mundial AI Hallucination Cases de Damien Charlotin. Verifica siempre en la fuente original.

El 22 de agosto de 2025, D. Idaho (Estados Unidos) conoció un asunto en el que un abogado se apoyó en una herramienta de IA generativa (no identificada en la decisión) y el expediente registró contenido alucinado.

Qué se alucinó

• Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Quoted Infuturia as stating removal is proper when the arbitration clause or award is raised in defense rather than the complaint; court found the quoted sentence does not appear in Infuturia.
• Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Quoted Jones Day v. Orrick as stating ‘‘a case need only relate to an arbitration agreement in the broadest sense’’; court found the phrase does not appear in the opinion.
• Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Quoted Jones Day as stating that if a Convention award ‘‘does not appear on the face of the complaint,’’ a ‘‘colorable defense relating to the award’’ is enough for federal jurisdiction; court found the phrase absent from the opinion.
• Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Quoted C.B.F. Industria de Gusa S/A v. AMCI Holdings as stating that recognition of an arbitral award and recognition of a foreign judgment enforcing that award are not mutually exclusive; court found the quoted phrase absent.
• Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Quoted National Aluminum Co. v. Peak Chemical as stating state judgment recognition statutes ‘‘do not override the provisions of the New York Convention or the FAA when those federal laws govern the underlying dispute’’; court found the phrase absent.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Cited Int'l Trading & Indus. Inv. Co. v. DynCorp Aerospace Tech. for the proposition that courts recognize the three-year limitations period under 9 U.S.C. § 207, though that case does not address the statute of limitations.

Desenlace

Court denied defendant's motion for leave to file a surreply, admonished counsel for submitting non-existent quotations, and granted plaintiff's motion to remand.. Sanción profesional: No.

Ficha del caso

Fuentes: aporte de /documents/738/Chenco_v._Do-Fluoride_USA_22_August_2025.pdf; base de datos de Damien Charlotin.

¿Conoces un caso que falte, o uno colombiano que debamos cubrir a fondo? Escríbenos.