City of Dickinson v. Helgeson

Ficha del Equipo Editorial a partir de la base mundial AI Hallucination Cases de Damien Charlotin. Verifica siempre en la fuente original.

El 12 de febrero de 2026, SC North Dakota (Estados Unidos) conoció un asunto en el que una parte sin abogado (litigante pro se) se apoyó en una herramienta de IA generativa (no identificada en la decisión) y el expediente registró contenido alucinado.

Qué se alucinó

• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Court determined the cited State v. $44,140.00 U.S. Currency, 2003 ND 28 657 N.W.2d 829 is a nonexistent authority in Helgeson's brief.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Court identified the citation State v. Clark, 2022 ND 85 999 N.W.2d 632 in Helgeson's brief as not corresponding to the asserted authority and found it fictitious as presented.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Court found the cited State v. Rogers, 2006 ND 85 712 N.W.2d 841 listed by Helgeson did not match the authority he relied on and was among the fictitious citations.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Court concluded the citation State ex rel. Stenehjem v. FreeEats.com Inc., 712 N.W.2d 828, 841 (N.D. 2006) as used by Helgeson was not an accurate existing authority and was treated as fictitious.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Appellant cited 'State v. Clark, 2012 ND 135, 818 N.W.2d 739' among other offered authorities; the court determined several of these offered citations were fictitious or misleading.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Appellant cited 'State ex rel. Olson v. City of Fargo, 250 N/A' in his brief; the court found the citation to be nonexistent after searching and listed a different, genuine Olson decision as unrelated.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Appellant cited 'State v. $44,140.00 U.S. Currency, 2003 ND 28, 657 N.W.2d 829' which the court determined did not exist as offered and did not support his arguments.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Appellant cited 'State v. $44,140.00 U.S. Currency, 2012 ND 176, 820 N.W.2d 697' as authority; the court found the offered citation to be fictitious and not the authority relied upon.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Appellant cited 'State v. Clark, 2022 ND 85, 999 N.W.2d 632' in his brief but the court found the citation did not correspond to supporting authority as offered.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Court found 'State ex rel. Olson v. City of Fargo, 250 N.W.2d 558 (N.D. 1977)' does not exist; court matched it to unrelated real reporters/titles and deemed it fictitious.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Court found 'State v. $44,140.00 U.S. Currency, 2003 ND 28 657 N.W.2d 829' as offered by Helgeson was nonexistent or misreferenced and did not support his claims.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Court identified 'State v. $44,140.00 U.S. Currency, 2012 ND 176, 820 N.W.2d 697' in Helgeson's brief as a non-existent or incorrect citation and treated it as fictitious.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Court noted 'State v. Clark, 2022 ND 85, 999 N.W.2d 632' as offered by Helgeson did not correspond to the cited authorities and was treated as a nonexistent/misleading citation.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Court found 'State ex rel. Stenehjem v. FreeEats.com Inc., 712 N.W.2d 828, 841 (N.D. 2006)' in Helgeson's brief to be a fictitious citation that did not exist as cited.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Court found the cited State ex rel. Olson v. City of Fargo, 250 N.W.2d 558 (N.D. 1977) does not exist and the offered citation does not support Helgeson's claim.

Desenlace

Sanción económica: 500 USD. Sanción profesional: No.

Ficha del caso

Fuentes: aporte de /documents/1488/City_of_Dickinson_v_Helgeson.pdf; base de datos de Damien Charlotin.

¿Conoces un caso que falte, o uno colombiano que debamos cubrir a fondo? Escríbenos.