Creditors Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. All Season Power LLC, et al.

Ficha del Equipo Editorial a partir de la base mundial AI Hallucination Cases de Damien Charlotin. Verifica siempre en la fuente original.

El 13 de febrero de 2026, C.D. California (Estados Unidos) conoció un asunto en el que un abogado se apoyó en una IA generativa no identificada y el expediente registró contenido alucinado.

Qué se alucinó

• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Plaintiff's counsel cited a non-existent (phantom) case in its brief; counsel later admitted the citation was from a non-existent case produced by AI-assisted research and the court noted the error.
• Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Plaintiff's counsel included a quoted passage attributed to a real case, but the quote does not exist in the source—one of three phantom quotes identified in counsel's declaration.
• Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. A second non-existent quotation was attributed to an existing case in Plaintiff's brief; counsel admitted the quote was erroneous and tied the error to AI-assisted research.
• Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. A third non-existent quotation (attributed to a real case) was identified; Defendant later acknowledged that one of the same erroneous citations appeared in its reply brief.

Desenlace

Warning. Sanción profesional: No.

Ficha del caso

Fuentes: aporte de https://reason.com/volokh/2026/03/17/perhaps-due-to-the-asynchronous-thelma-and-louise-neither-side-requests-sanctions/; base de datos de Damien Charlotin.

¿Conoces un caso que falte, o uno colombiano que debamos cubrir a fondo? Escríbenos.