Department of Justice v Wise

Ficha del Equipo Editorial a partir de la base mundial AI Hallucination Cases de Damien Charlotin. Verifica siempre en la fuente original.

El 13 de mayo de 2025, Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal (Australia) conoció un asunto en el que una parte sin abogado (litigante pro se) se apoyó en una herramienta de IA generativa (no identificada en la decisión) y el expediente registró contenido alucinado.

Qué se alucinó

• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Party cited 'Re Bowen [2010] QCAT 246' which the Tribunal found does not exist; citation belongs to an unrelated case.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Party cited 'Baha v Queensland Police Service [2011] QCAT 156' which the Tribunal found does not exist; citation belongs to an unrelated case.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Party cited 'Brock v Medical Board [2020] QCAT 223' which the Tribunal found does not exist; citation belongs to an unrelated case.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Party cited 'TCT v Office of the Health Ombudsman [2021] QCAT 44' which the Tribunal found does not exist; citation belongs to an unrelated case.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Party relied on Re JRL; Ex parte CJL to claim a member cannot decide their own recusal; Tribunal held the case does not support that and confirmed the practice is the member decides their recusal.
• Tergiversación de norma legal. Party invoked QCAT Act s 220(3) to argue another member should determine recusal/stay; Tribunal held s 220 concerns excluding disruptive persons and is irrelevant.
• Tergiversación de norma legal. Party asserted QCAT Act s 214(2) required publication of reasons relating to medical incapacity; Tribunal held s 214 deals with witness offences and is not relevant.
• Tergiversación de pruebas o escritos. Party claimed written reasons for the 1 May 2025 stay refusal were not provided; Tribunal found written reasons were provided on 1 May 2025.
• Tergiversación de pruebas o escritos. Party claimed to have filed a third recusal application on 13 March 2025; Tribunal found no such application on file and no attachment evidencing it.
• Tergiversación de pruebas o escritos. Party asserted there was a refusal to list medical evidence for hearing; Tribunal noted the application based on medical evidence was listed for hearing on 14 May 2025.

Desenlace

Warning. Sanción profesional: No.

Ficha del caso

Fuentes: aporte de /documents/553/Department_of_Justice_v_Wise_Australia_11_June_2025.pdf; base de datos de Damien Charlotin.

¿Conoces un caso que falte, o uno colombiano que debamos cubrir a fondo? Escríbenos.