EFD USA, INC., et al. v. Band Pro Film and Digital, Inc., et al.
CA California · Estados Unidos, 18 de febrero de 2026 · Fabricación. Ficha verificada del Equipo Editorial.
Ficha del Equipo Editorial a partir de la base mundial AI Hallucination Cases de Damien Charlotin. Verifica siempre en la fuente original.
El 18 de febrero de 2026, CA California (Estados Unidos) conoció un asunto en el que un abogado se apoyó en una IA generativa no identificada y el expediente registró contenido alucinado.
Qué se alucinó
- Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Appellant quoted Lilienthal as stating tests for distinct claims ('(1) times of services performed; (2) specific obligations involved; and (3) resulting damages'), but the quotation does not appear in Lilienthal and the case does not address settlement offsets.
- Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Appellant quoted Rudick as stating that failure to respond waives an objection; the cited Rudick decision does not include that quotation.
- Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Appellant attributed a quotation about using extrinsic evidence to interpret a settlement reached in mediation (with arbitration clause) to Riverisland; the quoted language does not appear in Riverisland.
- Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Appellant attributed an objective-contract interpretation quotation to Leaf v. City of San Mateo; the Leaf opinion does not contain the quoted language and did not involve a contested contract.
- Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Appellant cited Milstein for the proposition 'a judgment by default admits all material allegations of the complaint,' but Milstein does not contain that language as quoted.
- Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Multiple additional fabricated quotations and inaccurate descriptions of legal authorities appeared across the opening and reply briefs, attributed by counsel to use of an AI system that altered citations during word-count reduction.
Desenlace
Monetary Sanction. Sanción económica: 900 USD. Sanción profesional: No.
Ficha del caso
| Caso | EFD USA, INC., et al. v. Band Pro Film and Digital, Inc., et al. |
| Jurisdicción | CA California |
| País | Estados Unidos |
| Fecha | 18 de febrero de 2026 |
| Quién usó IA | Lawyer |
| Herramienta | Unidentified |
| Área del derecho | contract |
Fuentes: aporte de /documents/1552/EFD_USA_v_BAND_PRO_FILM_AND_DIGITAL_IN_USA_18_February_2026.pdf; base de datos de Damien Charlotin.
¿Conoces un caso que falte, o uno colombiano que debamos cubrir a fondo? Escríbenos.