Family law Case

Ficha del Equipo Editorial a partir de la base mundial AI Hallucination Cases de Damien Charlotin. Verifica siempre en la fuente original.

El 18 de septiembre de 2025, Gent (Bélgica) conoció un asunto en el que un abogado se apoyó en una herramienta de IA generativa (no identificada en la decisión) y el expediente registró contenido alucinado.

Qué se alucinó

• Citas falsas de norma legal. Conclusion quotes Articles 871 and 877 Ger.W. in incorrect or non‑existent wording; court supplied correct formulations and found the cited language inaccurate.
• Citas falsas de norma legal. Conclusion cites an incorrect/oversimplified wording attributed to art. 962 Ger.W. about appointment of experts; court provided correct text and noted the cited version was wrong.
• Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Cited ECHR decision 'Moretti en Benedetti t. Italië (27 april 2010, nr. 16318/07)' with passages about paternity recognition was not found in the cited judgment (which concerned adoption) and the quoted language does not appear in the decision.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Regional court judgments (e.g., Hof van Beroep Antwerpen, 20 maart 2019 (2019/AR/0524); Hof van Beroep Brussel, 15 oktober 2018) cited in the conclusion could not be located in Juportal and appear unfindable.
• Fabricación de doctrina. A set of Belgian doctrinal works and articles (e.g., S. Stijns RW 2012-13; M. Puelinckx-Coene TPR 2010; F. Swennen TPR 2019, Handboek 2020) were found to be fictional/complete fabrications by the court's database searches.
• Tergiversación de norma legal. Conclusion contained an incorrect quotation attributed to old art. 1382 BW; court identified the wording as incorrect compared to the real text.
• Tergiversación de norma legal. Conclusion cites a non‑existent/incorrect passage attributed to old art. 318 BW regarding recognition where father never maintained a familial bond; court could not find such provision.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Multiple cassation decisions cited (e.g., 'Cass. 6 juni 2019 (C.18.0543.N)', 'Cass. 25 januari 2018 (C.17.0331.N)', 'Cass. 21 oktober 2013') were not found in Juridat/JURA/Juportal and appear unfindable.

Desenlace

Disregarded all fictitious/unfindable sources, admonished counsel. Sanción profesional: No.

Ficha del caso

Fuentes: aporte de /documents/879/1760690519185.pdf; base de datos de Damien Charlotin.

¿Conoces un caso que falte, o uno colombiano que debamos cubrir a fondo? Escríbenos.