Gauthier v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

Ficha del Equipo Editorial a partir de la base mundial AI Hallucination Cases de Damien Charlotin. Verifica siempre en la fuente original.

El 25 de noviembre de 2024, E.D. Tex. (Estados Unidos) conoció un asunto en el que un abogado se apoyó en la herramienta de IA Claude y el expediente registró contenido alucinado.

Qué se alucinó

• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Fabricated Fifth Circuit case 'Roca v. King’s Creek Plantation, LLC' cited; court found it does not exist.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Fabricated Fifth Circuit case 'Beets v. Texas Instruments, Inc.' cited; court found it does not exist.
• Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Quoted material attributed to Morales v. SimuFlite could not be located in the opinion.
• Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Quoted material attributed to White v. FCI USA, Inc. could not be located in the opinion.
• Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Quoted material attributed to Burton v. Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. could not be located in the opinion.
• Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Quoted material attributed to Texas Dep't of Human Servs. v. Hinds could not be located in the opinion.
• Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Quoted material attributed to Physio GP, Inc. v. Naifeh could not be located in the opinion.
• Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Quoted material attributed to City of Midland v. O’Bryant could not be located in the opinion.
• Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Quoted material attributed to the fabricated Roca case also could not be located (case itself nonexistent).

Desenlace

Monetary fine + Mandatory AI-related CLE Course + Disclosure to Client. Sanción económica: 2000 USD. Sanción profesional: No.

Ficha del caso

Fuentes: aporte de https://www.damiencharlotin.com/documents/238/Gauthier_v._Goodyear_US_DC_Eastern_Texas_November_25_2024.pdf; base de datos de Damien Charlotin.

¿Conoces un caso que falte, o uno colombiano que debamos cubrir a fondo? Escríbenos.