Gerou v. George, Whitten, and United States
E.D. Wisconsin · Estados Unidos, 18 de diciembre de 2025 · Citas falsas. Ficha verificada del Equipo Editorial.
Ficha del Equipo Editorial a partir de la base mundial AI Hallucination Cases de Damien Charlotin. Verifica siempre en la fuente original.
El 18 de diciembre de 2025, E.D. Wisconsin (Estados Unidos) conoció un asunto en el que una parte sin abogado (litigante pro se) se apoyó en una herramienta de IA generativa (no identificada en la decisión) y el expediente registró contenido alucinado.
Qué se alucinó
- Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Petitioners quoted Oates v. National Bank as stating banks 'may only deal in negotiable instruments and lawful money'; court found no such quote in Oates (100 U.S. 239 (1879)).
- Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Petitioners attributed to National Bank v. Matthews a statement that banks 'cannot lend their credit to another'; court found the cited case (98 U.S. 621 (1878)) does not contain that statement.
- Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Petitioners cited 'Commercial Bank of Cleveland v. Ely (1853)'; court could not locate that case and found the similar Commercial Bank of Cleveland v. Iola, 154 U.S. 617 (1875) does not contain the quoted language.
- Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Petitioners repeatedly quoted 'Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco v. United States (1919)'; court was unable to locate any case with that name or date.
- Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Petitioners cited 'Glover v. Standard Oil Co., 65 N.E.2d 389 (Ind. 1946)' to support that an unrebutted affidavit stands as truth; court traced citation to a different reported opinion which does not support that proposition.
- Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Petitioners cited Bank of Augusta v. Earle and Merchants' Bank v. State Bank as holding a bank that lends credit acts beyond its charter; court found those cases do not hold that proposition.
- Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Petitioners cited 'Farmers' & Mechanics' Bank v. Smith (1819)'; court could not locate any such case and noted the closest is an 1821 case that does not support petitioners' claims.
Desenlace
Warning. Sanción profesional: No.
Ficha del caso
| Caso | Gerou v. George, Whitten, and United States |
| Jurisdicción | E.D. Wisconsin |
| País | Estados Unidos |
| Fecha | 18 de diciembre de 2025 |
| Quién usó IA | Pro Se Litigant |
| Herramienta | Implied |
| Área del derecho | bankruptcy |
Fuentes: aporte de /documents/1197/Gerou_et_al._v._George_USA_18_December_2025.pdf; base de datos de Damien Charlotin.
¿Conoces un caso que falte, o uno colombiano que debamos cubrir a fondo? Escríbenos.