Hogan v. Treasury Board

Ficha del Equipo Editorial a partir de la base mundial AI Hallucination Cases de Damien Charlotin. Verifica siempre en la fuente original.

El 1 de octubre de 2025, Federal PSLREB (Canadá) conoció un asunto en el que una parte sin abogado (litigante pro se) se apoyó en una herramienta de IA generativa (no identificada en la decisión) y el expediente registró contenido alucinado.

Qué se alucinó

• Citas falsas de norma legal. Complainant repeatedly quoted an invented version of s.129(6) of the Canada Labour Code to claim entitlement to continued wages; the Board noted the quoted wording is fabricated and irrelevant because no directions were made by the Head.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Complainant cited 'Merriweather v. Canada (Attorney General), 2012 FC 109', which the Board states does not exist.
• Fabricación de doctrina. Complainant relied on a 'H&S Officer Training Module - Labour Program, 2018 edition' that the Board could not locate and treats as non-existent.
• Información desactualizada de ley derogada. Complainant relied on ss. 22 and 44 of the (former) FPSLRA to claim broad remedial/interim powers; the Board noted those sections were repealed in 2013 and did not say what the complainant attributed to them.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Complainant cited 'Fanning v. Treasury Board, 2023 FPSLREB 12', which the Board states does not exist.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Complainant cited 'Vancouver v. CUPE, 2006 SCC 27', which the Board states does not exist.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Complainant cited 'Canadian Human Rights Commission v. Canada (AG), 2018 FCA 12', which the Board states does not exist.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Complainant relied on IWA v. Consolidated-Bathurst Packaging Ltd., [1990] 1 SCR 282 for the proposition that administrative tribunals have authority to grant interim relief; the Board noted the case does not address interim relief and was mischaracterized.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Complainant relied on Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd., 2016 SCC 29 for the proposition that tribunals can grant interim relief; the Board found this to be a mischaracterization of that decision.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Complainant claimed White v. Treasury Board (Correctional Service of Canada), 2022 FPSLREB 52 supported interim wage orders; the Board observed that decision did not order interim relief and the complainant misrepresented it.

Desenlace

Sanción profesional: No.

Ficha del caso

Fuentes: aporte de /documents/1756/Hogan-v.-Treasury-Board-Department-of-Employment.pdf; base de datos de Damien Charlotin.

¿Conoces un caso que falte, o uno colombiano que debamos cubrir a fondo? Escríbenos.