In re: Sanctions Order of Kenney

Ficha del Equipo Editorial a partir de la base mundial AI Hallucination Cases de Damien Charlotin. Verifica siempre en la fuente original.

El 23 de octubre de 2025, CA Louisiana (Estados Unidos) conoció un asunto en el que un abogado se apoyó en la herramienta de IA ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, Google y el expediente registró contenido alucinado.

Qué se alucinó

• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Court found 'Burns v. State, 813 So.2d 574 (La. App. 1 Cir. 2001)' was entirely fabricated by generative AI and did not exist; reporter/page numbers pointed to unrelated cases.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Court found 'Smith v. Christus St. Patrick Hosp., 20-306 (La. App. 3 Cir. 11/3/20), 308 So.3d 1216' was fabricated by AI and the reporter/page numbers referenced an unrelated case.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Court found 'Doe v. Southwest Louisiana Hosp. Ass'n, 02-180 (La. App. 3 Cir. 7/10/02), 833 So.2d 1136' was fabricated by AI; referenced reporter/page numbers pointed to unrelated decisions.
• Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Court determined plaintiff's filing contained a false/altered quotation attributed to Thomas v. Reg'l Health Sys. of Acadiana and an incorrect reporter citation; quotation not found in the actual opinion.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Court found counsel misrepresented the holding of Acara v. Banks by asserting it supports that HIPAA violations may serve as evidence of standard of care in state tort claims; Acara does not support that proposition.

Desenlace

Costs order, 3 hours CLE on ethical use of generative AI, referral to Office of Disciplinary Counsel. Sanción económica: 1368 USD. Sanción profesional: Yes.

Ficha del caso

Fuentes: aporte de /documents/899/In_re_Sanctions_Order_of_Kenney_USA_23_October_2025.pdf; base de datos de Damien Charlotin.

¿Conoces un caso que falte, o uno colombiano que debamos cubrir a fondo? Escríbenos.