In re the Marriage of D.X. and S.P.
CA California · Estados Unidos, 30 de septiembre de 2025 · Fabricación. Ficha verificada del Equipo Editorial.
Ficha del Equipo Editorial a partir de la base mundial AI Hallucination Cases de Damien Charlotin. Verifica siempre en la fuente original.
El 30 de septiembre de 2025, CA California (Estados Unidos) conoció un asunto en el que una parte sin abogado (litigante pro se) se apoyó en una herramienta de IA generativa (no identificada en la decisión) y el expediente registró contenido alucinado.
Qué se alucinó
- Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Appellant cited this case to argue suicidal ideation cannot constitute abuse under the DVPA; appellate court found 'Quinn v. Levine (2021) 62 Cal.App.5th 366' to be fictitious/unlocatable and did not rely on it.
- Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Appellant relied on this authority to support her position on DVPA scope; the court was unable to locate 'In re Marriage of L.B. (2018) 30 Cal.App.5th 1076' and treated the citation as incorrect/unreliable.
- Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Appellant cited this decision in support of her arguments; the appellate court could not find 'In re Marriage of C.T. and R.T. (2017) 12 Cal.App.5th 982' and rejected reliance on it.
- Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Appellant cited this Supreme Court authority which the court could not locate as supporting authority; treated as an incorrect citation.
- Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Appellant cited this case for propositions on abuse/neglect; appellate court could not find 'In re Marriage of Mathews (2005) 133 Cal.App.4th 1407' and did not accept it as authority.
- Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Appellant relied on this citation for DVPA-related propositions; the court was unable to locate 'In re Marriage of Facter (2016) 1 Cal.App.5th 526' and treated it as erroneous.
- Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Appellant cited this case (with inconsistent citations) to support claims about separation/date issues; the appellate court could not locate 'In re Marriage of Manfer (2006) 144 Cal.App.4th 925' as cited and noted citation problems.
Desenlace
Warning. Sanción profesional: No.
Ficha del caso
| Caso | In re the Marriage of D.X. and S.P. |
| Jurisdicción | CA California |
| País | Estados Unidos |
| Fecha | 30 de septiembre de 2025 |
| Quién usó IA | Pro Se Litigant |
| Herramienta | Implied |
| Área del derecho | family |
Fuentes: aporte de /documents/838/In_re_the_Marriage_of_DX_and_SP_DX_v_SP_USA_30_September_2025.pdf; base de datos de Damien Charlotin.
¿Conoces un caso que falte, o uno colombiano que debamos cubrir a fondo? Escríbenos.