Jackson Federation of Teachers, et al. v. Lynn Fitch

Ficha del Equipo Editorial a partir de la base mundial AI Hallucination Cases de Damien Charlotin. Verifica siempre en la fuente original.

El 20 de julio de 2025, Mississippi (Estados Unidos) conoció un asunto en el que un juez se apoyó en la herramienta de IA Perplexity y el expediente registró contenido alucinado.

Qué se alucinó

• Tergiversación de pruebas o escritos. The TRO Order states that “[t]he Amended Complaint names the following Plaintiffs”: “Mississippi Association of Educators (MAE)”; “Dr. Daphne Chamberlain – faculty member at Tougaloo College”; “Dr. Robert Luckett – faculty member at Jackson State University”; “Dr. Brian Pugh - executive director of the Stennis Institute of Government at Mississippi State University”; “Z. Luckett – parent of public school children in Mississippi”; “Mississippi Votes – a nonprofit organization focused on civic engagement”; “Black Student Union at Jackson State University”; “Spectrum – a student organization at Jackson State University representing LGBTQ+ students”; “Aidan Carr – student at Millsaps College”; “Christopher Brent – student at Jackson State University”; “Mississippi Library Association”; and “Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc. – Mississippi Chapters.” ECF #51 at 1, n.1. As confirmed by this Court’s docket, of the parties identified in footnote 1 of the TRO Order as “Plaintiffs,” only one—viz., Mississippi Association of Educators1—is or has ever been a named plaintiff in this case. See ECF #1, #22
• Tergiversación de pruebas o escritos. The TRO Order states that the First Amended Complaint names as “specific institutional impacts” the “cessation of DEI offices and initiatives at Jackson State University, Alcorn State University, and Hinds Community College” and “cancellation of implicit bias and Safe Zone training.” ECF #51 at 4. None of these allegations appears in the Amended Complaint. See ECF #22
• Tergiversación de pruebas o escritos. The TRO Order further states that “[a]t least three public institutions— Jackson State University, Alcorn State University, and Hinds Community College— allegedly already have terminated DEI initiatives and cancelled scheduled programming.” ECF #51 at 7-8. No such allegations appear in the Amended Complaint, and Defendants have not identified any record evidence supporting this finding.
• Tergiversación de pruebas o escritos. Similarly, the TRO Order states that “[a]t Jackson State University, faculty members have been instructed not to discuss gender theory or historical interpretations involving systemic racism,” and that “Hinds Community College has cancelled Safe Zone training previously mandatory for staff, and faculty members report confusion over whether discussing concepts such as intersectionality or implicit bias violates HB 1193. ECF #51 at 12. No such allegations appear in the Amended Complaint, and Defendants have not identified any record evidence supporting these findings.
• Citas falsas de norma legal. The TRO Order further states that H.B. 1193 prohibits the dissemination, endorsement, or engagement with “race or sex stereotyping,” “race or sex scapegoating,” and “critical race theory,” all three terms being referenced in the TRO Order with quotation marks, as if excerpted verbatim from H.B. 1193. Id. at 9. However, none of these quoted terms appears in the text of H.B. 1193. See ECF #11-14. Similarly, the TRO Order elsewhere states that H.B. 1193 contains undefined terms such as “critical race theory” and “institutional bias,” both being referenced in the TRO Order with quotation marks, as if excerpted verbatim from H.B. 1193. ECF #51 at 11. Yet neither of these terms appears in the text of H.B. 1193. SeeECF #11-14
• Tergiversación de pruebas o escritos. Finally, as support for the Court’s ruling, the TRO Order references the declarations of four individuals identified as Brandy Williams, Leslie-Burl McLemore, Dr. Rhea Bishop, and Natalie Collier. ECF #51 at 14-15. The TRO Order identifies ECF #111, #11-2, #11-3, and #11-4, respectively, as the source of these declarations. See ECF #51at 14-15, nn.13-16. But those record citations in fact reflect the declarations of others who are not referenced in the TRO Order (namely, Carmen Dunn, Barbara Phillips, D’Andra Orey, and Cliff Johnson, respectively), which declarations contain content that is substantively different from the content referenced in the TRO Order. In fact, the four aforementioned declarations referenced in the TRO Order do not appear in this record at all.

Desenlace

Judge withdrew the order. Sanción profesional: No.

Ficha del caso

Fuentes: base de datos de Damien Charlotin.

¿Conoces un caso que falte, o uno colombiano que debamos cubrir a fondo? Escríbenos.