K.W. v. Ringwood Board of Education

Ficha del Equipo Editorial a partir de la base mundial AI Hallucination Cases de Damien Charlotin. Verifica siempre en la fuente original.

El 15 de mayo de 2026, D. New Jersey (Estados Unidos) conoció un asunto en el que un abogado se apoyó en una herramienta de IA generativa (no identificada en la decisión) y el expediente registró contenido alucinado.

Qué se alucinó

• Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Two quoted passages attributed to Lauren W. v. DeFlaminis were not found in the cited opinion.
• Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Second quoted passage from Lauren W. v. DeFlaminis also not located by the court in the cited pages.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Plaintiff cited M.D. v. Colonial Sch. Dist. for a proposition about C.H.; court found the cited pages (388-90) do not discuss C.H. (discussion begins at p.393).
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Plaintiff appended a parenthetical to K.D. that misstates K.D.'s content and misattributes Chao/Skidmore; court noted K.D. has no footnotes and did not cite Chao to Skidmore.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Court could not locate J.T. v. Depew Union Free Sch. Dist. under the cited reporter number; the cited reporter (63 F.4th 94) yields no results and the case name could not be located.
• Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Quoted language attributed to S.H. v. State-Operated Sch. Dist. of Newark was not found in the cited opinion.
• Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Plaintiff quoted Ridley Sch. Dist. v. M.R. with added language 'and deference'; court found the actual opinion reads differently.
• Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Court could not locate the quoted language attributed to M.R. v. Ridley Sch. Dist. in the cited pages.
• Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Quoted language ascribed to M.H. v. New York City Dep't of Educ. could not be located in the cited decision.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Plaintiff's LEXIS reporter citation for D.A. led to an unrelated case; the D.N.J. opinion the court found (2009 WL 972605) does not contain the quoted language.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Reporter designation for J.L. v. Mercer Island led to an unrelated Ninth Circuit decision; the actual Ninth Circuit IDEA opinion located does not contain the quoted language nor support the proposition.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Plaintiff cited Capistrano Unified with a reporter that resolves to an unrelated case; the actual Ninth Circuit decision located does not contain the quoted language or support the proposition.

Desenlace

Order to explain past citations. Sanción profesional: No.

Ficha del caso

Fuentes: aporte de /documents/2181/KW_v._Ringwood_Board_USA_15_May_2026.pdf; base de datos de Damien Charlotin.

¿Conoces un caso que falte, o uno colombiano que debamos cubrir a fondo? Escríbenos.