Kapahi Real Estate Inc. v. Elite Real Estate Club of Toronto Inc.
Ontario SCJ · Canadá, 10 de marzo de 2026 · Citas falsas. Ficha verificada del Equipo Editorial.
Ficha del Equipo Editorial a partir de la base mundial AI Hallucination Cases de Damien Charlotin. Verifica siempre en la fuente original.
El 10 de marzo de 2026, Ontario SCJ (Canadá) conoció un asunto en el que un abogado se apoyó en una herramienta de IA generativa (no identificada en la decisión) y el expediente registró contenido alucinado.
Qué se alucinó
- Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Paragraph 44 of the Reply Factum purports to quote BH Frontier Solutions Inc. v. 11054660 Canada Inc.; the court found the quoted passage does not appear in the decision and is wholly made up.
- Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Paragraph 52 of the Reply Factum purports to quote Trustees of the Millwright Regional Council of Ontario Pension Trust Fund v. Celestica Inc.; the court found the quoted passage does not appear in the decision and is wholly made up (and misattributes authorship).
- Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Paragraph 58 of the Reply Factum purports to quote Pita Royale Inc.; the court found the quoted passage does not appear in the decision and is wholly made up.
- Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Paragraph 79 of the Reply Factum again purports to quote Trustees of the Millwright Regional Council of Ontario Pension Trust Fund v. Celestica Inc.; the court found the quoted passage does not appear in the decision and is wholly made up (and misattributes the author).
- Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Paragraph 36 of the Reply Factum purports to quote Sattva Capital Corp. v. Creston Moly Corp.; the court found the quoted passage does not appear in the decision and is wholly made up.
- Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Paragraph 41 of the Reply Factum purports to quote FNF Enterprises Inc. v. Wag and Train Inc.; the court found the quoted passage does not appear in the decision and is wholly made up.
- Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Paragraph 43 of the Reply Factum purports to quote Pita Royale Inc. v. Buckingham Properties Inc.; the court found the quoted passage does not appear in the decision and is wholly made up.
Desenlace
Bar Referral. Sanción profesional: No.
Ficha del caso
| Caso | Kapahi Real Estate Inc. v. Elite Real Estate Club of Toronto Inc. |
| Jurisdicción | Ontario SCJ |
| País | Canadá |
| Fecha | 10 de marzo de 2026 |
| Quién usó IA | Lawyer |
| Herramienta | Implied |
| Área del derecho | contract |
Fuentes: aporte de /documents/1642/2026onsc1438.pdf; base de datos de Damien Charlotin.
¿Conoces un caso que falte, o uno colombiano que debamos cubrir a fondo? Escríbenos.