Kennon v. Ashley

Ficha del Equipo Editorial a partir de la base mundial AI Hallucination Cases de Damien Charlotin. Verifica siempre en la fuente original.

El 18 de febrero de 2026, D. Kansas (Estados Unidos) conoció un asunto en el que un abogado se apoyó en una herramienta de IA generativa (no identificada en la decisión) y el expediente registró contenido alucinado.

Qué se alucinó

• Citas falsas de pruebas o escritos. A block-quoted colloquy attributed to Ashley (including 'what he said, not what he did' and 'It was the language') is quoted as from Doc.55-1 at 33:2-11 but the court found those phrases do not appear at that location or elsewhere in the deposition.
• Citas falsas de pruebas o escritos. Plaintiff quotes exchanges purportedly showing Ashley answered 'No, not that I recall,' 'There was no contact,' and 'not threatening'; court found those quoted answers do not appear in the cited portions of Ashley's deposition (Doc.55-1 at 107:13-15,108:2-6,109:1-4).
• Citas falsas de pruebas o escritos. Plaintiff attributes to Spencer a block quote denying any threatening behavior after watching bodycam ('No. I didn't.' / 'He didn't do that'); court found those phrases and the quoted exchange do not appear at Doc.55-2 80:4-6,81:1-3.
• Citas falsas de pruebas o escritos. Plaintiff quotes Ashley as saying he concluded disorderly conduct 'after reviewing the video footage' (Doc.55-1 at 151:4-9); court found the deposition does not contain 'footage' or the asserted colloquy at the cited location.
• Citas falsas de pruebas o escritos. Plaintiff attributes to Ashley a short exchange ('No.' / 'So why did you arrest him?' / 'He said, "Take me to jail." I said, "Okay."') citing Doc.55-1 at 116:12-17; court found the quoted exchange as presented does not exist and omits surrounding context that contradicts the representation.
• Citas falsas de pruebas o escritos. Plaintiff quotes a long passage allegedly from Doc.55-1 at 161:22-162:16; the court found the precise quoted passage does not exist at that citation.
• Fabricación de pruebas o escritos. Plaintiff's brief quotes Ashley as admitting the arrest was based solely on 'language' and that there were 'no threatening gestures or movements'; court found the quoted phrase does not appear at Doc.55-1 33:7-11 or elsewhere in the deposition.
• Fabricación de pruebas o escritos. Brief asserts Ashley testified he did not determine probable cause until months later after reviewing video; court found the cited portion (Doc.55-1 at 151:4-13) does not support that statement and the word 'footage' does not appear there.
• Fabricación de pruebas o escritos. Plaintiff claims both Ashley and Spencer confirmed Kennon made no threatening gestures and 'never chested up' in a disorderly-conduct manner; court found Ashley's cited testimony actually describes chesting up and Spencer's testimony differs, so the quoted summary is inaccurate/nonexistent.

Desenlace

Order to Show Cause. Sanción profesional: No.

Ficha del caso

Fuentes: aporte de /documents/1557/Kennon_v._Ashley_USA_18_February_2026.pdf; base de datos de Damien Charlotin.

¿Conoces un caso que falte, o uno colombiano que debamos cubrir a fondo? Escríbenos.