Lipe v. Albuquerque Public Schools (1)

Ficha del Equipo Editorial a partir de la base mundial AI Hallucination Cases de Damien Charlotin. Verifica siempre en la fuente original.

El 22 de septiembre de 2025, D. New Mexico (Estados Unidos) conoció un asunto en el que un abogado se apoyó en una herramienta de IA generativa (no identificada en la decisión) y el expediente registró contenido alucinado.

Qué se alucinó

• Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. A quotation attributed to Ogden v. San Juan Cnty., 32 F.3d 452 (10th Cir. 1994) was presented though the quoted language does not appear in that opinion.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Characterized Gates Rubber as imposing sanctions for failure to supplement discovery; the Court states sanctions there were for intentional destruction of evidence.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Relied on a non-existent case, as admitted in a prior filing and noted by the Court.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Relied on a non-existent case, as admitted in a prior filing and noted by the Court.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Previously submitted misattributed citation noted by the Court.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Previously submitted misattributed citation noted by the Court.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Relied on a non-existent case, as admitted in a prior filing and noted by the Court.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Cited Qualcomm for an attorney’s general duty to ensure clients conduct a comprehensive document search; the Court notes Qualcomm addressed a patent owner’s disclosure duty and litigation misconduct, not a general civil discovery duty.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Cited Qualcomm for the proposition that sanctions serve remedial and deterrent purposes; the Court states Qualcomm does not discuss discovery sanctions.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Described Dominion Video as emphasizing procedural compliance in litigation conduct; the Court explains it was a merits decision on a preliminary injunction and intervention, not a procedural/discovery ruling.
• Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Quoted parenthetical attributed to Zubulake that does not appear in the opinion, per the Court.

Desenlace

Monetary sanction; self-report to state bars. Sanción económica: 3000 USD. Sanción profesional: No.

Ficha del caso

Fuentes: aporte de /documents/805/Lipe_v_Albuequerque_Public_Schools.pdf; base de datos de Damien Charlotin.

¿Conoces un caso que falte, o uno colombiano que debamos cubrir a fondo? Escríbenos.