Mattox v. Product Innovation Research

Ficha del Equipo Editorial a partir de la base mundial AI Hallucination Cases de Damien Charlotin. Verifica siempre en la fuente original.

El 22 de octubre de 2025, E.D. Oklahoma (Estados Unidos) conoció un asunto en el que un abogado se apoyó en la herramienta de IA ChatGPT y el expediente registró contenido alucinado.

Qué se alucinó

• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Court found no case under this citation; similar Tenth Circuit decision exists but does not contain the quoted law.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Citation combined/ conflated unrelated authorities; court found no case at that citation and similar decisions do not support the quoted law.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Court found no case under the cited name and citation; citation appears fabricated/mismatched.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. No Tenth Circuit decision exists at that citation; the docketed citation corresponds to an unrelated out-of-circuit case.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Court found no case under that citation; similar named district decision exists but does not support plaintiffs' asserted rule.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Court located no case under this citation; authority appears fabricated.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Plaintiffs cited the wrong year/citation for the decision; court identified correct authority.
• Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Court determined the specific language plaintiffs attributed to the case does not appear in the opinion cited.
• Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Court found the law plaintiffs claimed derived from this Supreme Court opinion was not present in the opinion as quoted.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Court concluded the decision does not hold the proposition plaintiffs attributed to it.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Court found no decision at this federal reporter/citation; cited authority is incorrect or nonexistent.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Plaintiffs cited an incorrect citation; the court identified the correct citation and that the cited version was erroneous.

Desenlace

Pleadings struck; public reprimands; monetary sanctions; remedial filing and certification requirements. Sanción económica: 28495 USD. Sanción profesional: Yes.

Ficha del caso

Fuentes: aporte de /documents/904/Mattox_v._Product_Innovations_Research_USA_22_October_2025.pdf; base de datos de Damien Charlotin.

¿Conoces un caso que falte, o uno colombiano que debamos cubrir a fondo? Escríbenos.