Mavy v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Ficha del Equipo Editorial a partir de la base mundial AI Hallucination Cases de Damien Charlotin. Verifica siempre en la fuente original.

El 13 de enero de 2026, D. Arizona (Estados Unidos) conoció un asunto en el que un abogado se apoyó en una herramienta de IA generativa (no identificada en la decisión) y el expediente registró contenido alucinado.

Qué se alucinó

• Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Cited district court decision Hobbs does not exist.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Lubin was quoted as forbidding ALJs from disregarding moderate CPP limitations without explanation; that language is not in Lubin.
• Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Garrison was cited as holding ALJs must connect symptoms to functional limitations in the RFC; no such express holding appears at p. 1017.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Garrison was quoted with an added phrase not in the case; only the first portion (as a parenthetical to a Seventh Circuit case) appears, the latter part does not.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Lingenfelter was quoted as stating narcotic pain treatment is not inconsistent with disabling pain testimony; no such quote exists.
• Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Trevizo was cited as requiring consideration of waxing and waning impairments; the case contains no such discussion or requirement.
• Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Revels was quoted as saying fibromyalgia symptoms are 'entirely subjective' and must be evaluated accordingly; that language does not appear in Revels.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Garrison was cited for a requirement that the RFC reflect all impairments in combination; p. 1016 does not contain such a requirement.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Barrett was cited (and mislabeled as Ninth Circuit) for remand due to obesity’s impact on fibromyalgia/DDD; the case does not mention obesity, fibromyalgia, or disc disease.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Orn was cited as requiring the ALJ to explain how impairments are accommodated in the RFC; no such requirement appears at p. 639.
• Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Revels was attributed the quote that fibromyalgia symptoms are entirely subjective and have no lab tests; that quoted language does not appear in Revels.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Brink was cited for simple, routine tasks limits; the quoted phrase is slightly different and the proposition is inapposite.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Cited district court decision Brown v. Colvin does not exist.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Cited district court decision Wofford v. Berryhill does not exist.

Desenlace

Revocation of pro hac vice status, striking of the brief. Sanción profesional: Yes.

Ficha del caso

Fuentes: aporte de /documents/1309/Mavy_v._Commissionner_USA_13_January_2026.pdf; base de datos de Damien Charlotin.

¿Conoces un caso que falte, o uno colombiano que debamos cubrir a fondo? Escríbenos.