Mitchell Taylor Button et al. v. John Jimison (1)
W.D. Washington · Estados Unidos, 17 de octubre de 2025 · Citas falsas. Ficha verificada del Equipo Editorial.
Ficha del Equipo Editorial a partir de la base mundial AI Hallucination Cases de Damien Charlotin. Verifica siempre en la fuente original.
El 17 de octubre de 2025, W.D. Washington (Estados Unidos) conoció un asunto en el que una parte sin abogado (litigante pro se) se apoyó en una herramienta de IA generativa (no identificada en la decisión) y el expediente registró contenido alucinado.
Qué se alucinó
- Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Plaintiffs quoted a supposed Ninth Circuit case for the phrase 'to weed out meritless suits at an early stage' but the Court could not locate the cited case or the quote in any Ninth Circuit opinion.
- Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Plaintiffs cited a Washington Court of Appeals case purportedly stating defamatory statements about private individuals 'do not become matters of public concern merely because they touch on litigation,' but the Court could not find the case or the quoted language in any Washington opinion.
- Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Plaintiffs quoted a Washington Court of Appeals case as saying UPEPA protects speech 'on issues of legitimate public debate,' but that quote does not appear in the cited opinion.
- Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Plaintiffs quoted a Tenth Circuit opinion for the proposition '[a] litigant may not manipulate procedure to gain tactical advantage,' but the Court was unable to locate the cited Tenth Circuit opinion or the quoted language.
- Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Plaintiffs cited a Southern District of California case/order for the proposition that blanket denials do not comply with Rule 8; while a case by that name exists, the Court could not locate the specific order Plaintiffs cited.
- Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Plaintiffs cited a case from this district for the proposition the Court can strike an unintelligible answer, but the Court could not locate the cited case; the case number referenced an unassigned, administratively terminated matter.
Desenlace
Order include signed certification. Sanción profesional: No.
Ficha del caso
| Caso | Mitchell Taylor Button et al. v. John Jimison (1) |
| Jurisdicción | W.D. Washington |
| País | Estados Unidos |
| Fecha | 17 de octubre de 2025 |
| Quién usó IA | Pro Se Litigant |
| Herramienta | Implied |
| Área del derecho | civil rights |
Fuentes: aporte de /documents/891/Button_v._Jimison_USA_17_October_2025.pdf; base de datos de Damien Charlotin.
¿Conoces un caso que falte, o uno colombiano que debamos cubrir a fondo? Escríbenos.