Myriane Béland v. Procureur général du Canada

Ficha del Equipo Editorial a partir de la base mundial AI Hallucination Cases de Damien Charlotin. Verifica siempre en la fuente original.

El 11 de junio de 2026, Federal Court (Canadá) conoció un asunto en el que una parte sin abogado (litigante pro se) se apoyó en una IA generativa no identificada y el expediente registró contenido alucinado.

Qué se alucinó

• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. The applicant listed 'Mazhero v Canada (Attorney General), 2019 FC 575' among authorities that appeared inaccurate or non-existent and were disregarded by the Court.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. The applicant listed 'Crichlow v Canada (Treasury Board), 2010 PSLRB 122' which the respondent flagged as apparently inaccurate/non-existent; the Court omitted it.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. The applicant listed 'Baldwin v Canada (Attorney General), 2019 FC 1119' among the questionable authorities; the respondent said it appeared inaccurate and the Court disregarded it.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Applicant cited 'Kaweesa v Canada, 2019 CF 134' to support a procedural fairness proposition; the neutral citation 2019 CF 134 actually refers to Aguirre Renteria v Canada, a different immigration decision and not supportive of the argument.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Applicant cited 'Singh v Canada, 2015 CF 120' for a quote on procedural fairness at para. 27; the neutral citation 2015 FC 120 corresponds to Siliya v Canada, an unrelated immigration matter.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Applicant cited 'Zolotareva v Canada, 2020 CF 95' for the proposition that fairness may require adaptation of procedures; the neutral citation 2020 CF 95 corresponds to Sangha v Canada, not Zolotareva.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. The applicant's jurisprudence list included 'Khalil v Canada (Attorney General), 2012 FC 436', which the respondent identified as inaccurate or non-existent and the Court disregarded it.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. The applicant listed 'Komolafe v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2013 FC 802' which was identified as inaccurate/non-existent and ignored by the Court.

Desenlace

Monetary Sanction. Sanción económica: 500 USD. Sanción profesional: No.

Ficha del caso

Fuentes: aporte de /documents/2383/Beland-c.-Canada-Procureur-General-2026-CF-779.pdf; base de datos de Damien Charlotin.

¿Conoces un caso que falte, o uno colombiano que debamos cubrir a fondo? Escríbenos.