Parker v. Forsyth NNO and Others

Ficha del Equipo Editorial a partir de la base mundial AI Hallucination Cases de Damien Charlotin. Verifica siempre en la fuente original.

El 29 de junio de 2023, Magistrates' Court (Sudáfrica) conoció un asunto en el que un abogado se apoyó en la herramienta de IA ChatGPT y el expediente registró contenido alucinado.

Qué se alucinó

• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Plaintiff's attorneys cited this as authority that a body corporate can sue for defamation; the court found after directed research that it does not exist and counsel conceded it was AI-generated.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Offered by Plaintiff's attorneys to show a body corporate sued for defamation; the court determined the case and citation are fictitious, conceded by counsel.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Proffered as an example of a successful defamation claim against a body corporate; the court found the case does not exist; counsel conceded it was fabricated.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Cited to show a natural person sued a body corporate for defamation; the court found no such case exists; counsel conceded fabrication.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Listed generally as defamation authority involving a body corporate; the court held the case and citation are fictitious; counsel conceded.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Listed generally as defamation authority involving a body corporate; the court found it does not exist; counsel conceded.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Listed generally as defamation authority involving a body corporate; the court found the case and citation are fictitious; counsel conceded.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Listed generally as defamation authority involving a body corporate; the court found no such case exists; counsel conceded fabrication.
• Tergiversación de norma legal. Plaintiff's heads asserted there are 'several authorities' that a body corporate may sue/be sued without limitation for defamation; after the court-ordered research, no such authorities were found and counsel conceded none exist.

Desenlace

Plaintiff’s claim dismissed; punitive costs awarded on an attorney-and-client scale for specific period due to AI-generated hallucinated case law. Sanción profesional: No.

Ficha del caso

Fuentes: aporte de https://www.damiencharlotin.com/documents/336/Parker_v_Forsyth_NNO_and_Others_South_Africa_June_29_2023.pdf; base de datos de Damien Charlotin.

¿Conoces un caso que falte, o uno colombiano que debamos cubrir a fondo? Escríbenos.