[Plaintiff] v. Webb Chevrolet, Inc., et al.
CA Illinois · Estados Unidos, 9 de febrero de 2026 · Citas falsas. Ficha verificada del Equipo Editorial.
Ficha del Equipo Editorial a partir de la base mundial AI Hallucination Cases de Damien Charlotin. Verifica siempre en la fuente original.
El 9 de febrero de 2026, CA Illinois (Estados Unidos) conoció un asunto en el que una parte sin abogado (litigante pro se) se apoyó en una herramienta de IA generativa (no identificada en la decisión) y el expediente registró contenido alucinado.
Qué se alucinó
- Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Plaintiff attributed a specific quote to Fox v. Heiman that does not appear in that opinion; court noted Fox does not mention section 2-619 or contain the quoted language.
- Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Plaintiff asserted Concepcion supports limitations on arbitration protecting consumer claims; court observed Concepcion does not include the propositions plaintiff attributed to it.
- Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Plaintiff claimed Kinkel and Gallagher stand for broad public-policy limits on arbitration clauses; court found neither case supports the sweeping propositions plaintiff attributed to them.
- Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Plaintiff cited a nonexistent Illinois opinion; court searched and found no case by this name and the cited volume/page corresponded to an unrelated criminal opinion.
- Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Plaintiff cited a nonexistent case title/citation; court found the actual opinion at that citation was a different case and no 'Sears v. Illinois Central Savings & Loan' exists.
- Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Plaintiff cited a case by name and citation that do not exist in Illinois or elsewhere; court's search returned no such authority.
- Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Plaintiff cited a nonexistent opinion and attributed a specific holding; court found no such case or holding at the citation provided.
- Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Plaintiff cited a case title/citation that matched other unrelated opinions; court found no support for the claimed arbitration-related holding.
- Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Plaintiff quoted language purportedly from Smith v. Airoom that does not appear in the opinion; court found the quoted language and the asserted principles absent from Smith.
- Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Plaintiff attributed a holding to Keefe that the case does not contain (re: section 2-619 not a responsive pleading); court found Keefe does not contain the quoted language or discuss section 2-619.
Desenlace
Order to show cause. Sanción profesional: No.
Ficha del caso
| Caso | [Plaintiff] v. Webb Chevrolet, Inc., et al. |
| Jurisdicción | CA Illinois |
| País | Estados Unidos |
| Fecha | 9 de febrero de 2026 |
| Quién usó IA | Pro Se Litigant |
| Herramienta | Implied |
| Área del derecho | contract |
Fuentes: aporte de /documents/1475/Palsen_v._Chevrolet_USA_9_February_2026.pdf; base de datos de Damien Charlotin.
¿Conoces un caso que falte, o uno colombiano que debamos cubrir a fondo? Escríbenos.