Pletcher v. Village of Libertyville Police Pension Board

Ficha del Equipo Editorial a partir de la base mundial AI Hallucination Cases de Damien Charlotin. Verifica siempre en la fuente original.

El 24 de noviembre de 2025, AC Illinois (Estados Unidos) conoció un asunto en el que una parte sin abogado (litigante pro se) se apoyó en una IA generativa no identificada y el expediente registró contenido alucinado.

Qué se alucinó

• Fabricación de pruebas o escritos. Plaintiff cited non-existent record page numbers and referenced exhibits (A-F) that were never introduced into the administrative record; court noted these citations to the record do not exist.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Plaintiff cited a nonexistent case and quoted a favorable holding that does not exist; court found the case fictitious.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Plaintiff cited a nonexistent case as authority for a rule on selective medical opinions; court found the citation fictitious.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Plaintiff cited a nonexistent case claiming recognition of cumulative stress effects on cardiovascular health; court found citation fictitious.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Plaintiff cited a nonexistent case to argue that a 14-month delay violated a statutory timeframe; court found the citation fictitious.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Plaintiff cited a nonexistent case on delay in issuing rulings; court found the case does not exist and plaintiff later conceded it was inapplicable.
• Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Plaintiff attributed a favorable holding to Bowlin that the case does not contain; court determined the quoted language is not in Bowlin.
• Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Plaintiff quoted Johnson as stating inability to comply with treatment does not negate disability; court found Johnson does not support that statement.
• Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Plaintiff quoted Knight as holding that persistence despite treatment does not infer non-compliance; court found Knight does not contain that language.
• Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Plaintiff attributed a broad rebuke of selective expert reliance to Roszak that the case does not support; court found the quote misleading.
• Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Plaintiff claimed Jones supports a finding about shift work and cardiovascular harm; court found Jones does not address hypertension or related conditions.
• Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Plaintiff attributed a genetics-related holding to Johnston that the case does not contain; court found the quoted language absent from Johnston.

Desenlace

Plaintiff's appellate brief stricken and appeal dismissed. Sanción profesional: No.

Ficha del caso

Fuentes: aporte de /documents/1368/Pletcher_v_Village_of_Libertyville_Police_Pension_Board.pdf; base de datos de Damien Charlotin.

¿Conoces un caso que falte, o uno colombiano que debamos cubrir a fondo? Escríbenos.