Prososki v. Regan

Ficha del Equipo Editorial a partir de la base mundial AI Hallucination Cases de Damien Charlotin. Verifica siempre en la fuente original.

El 20 de marzo de 2026, Nebraska SC (Estados Unidos) conoció un asunto en el que un abogado se apoyó en una IA generativa no identificada y el expediente registró contenido alucinado.

Qué se alucinó

• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Brief cites 'Miller v. Miller, 227 Neb. 71, 416 N.W.2d 358 (1987)' and attributes quotations/holdings that the court determined are fictitious; the citation refers to a nonexistent authority as used.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Brief repeatedly cited 'Kennedy v. Kennedy, 27 Neb. App. 510, 934 N.W.2d 57 (2019)' and included block quotations and holdings not present; the cited unreported memorandum opinion does not contain the quoted language or the purported holding.
• Citas falsas de norma legal. Brief purports to quote Neb. Rev. Stat. § 43-2923 as stating a specific policy favoring frequent contact with both parents; the statute does not contain the quoted language and was misquoted.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Brief attributes quotations and holdings to Bergmeier v. Bergmeier that do not appear in that opinion and misstates the case's holdings.
• Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Brief attributes a quoted principle about notice of issues to Simons v. Simons that does not appear in the opinion; the quoted language cannot be found in the case and the case does not support the proposition advanced.

Desenlace

Appellant's brief stricken; appellant's appeal dismissed; Bar referral; Suspension. Sanción profesional: Yes.

Ficha del caso

Fuentes: aporte de /documents/1699/N00013081PUB.pdf; base de datos de Damien Charlotin.

¿Conoces un caso que falte, o uno colombiano que debamos cubrir a fondo? Escríbenos.