Reclamação (RCL) 78.890 / BA

Ficha del Equipo Editorial a partir de la base mundial AI Hallucination Cases de Damien Charlotin. Verifica siempre en la fuente original.

El 12 de mayo de 2025, Supremo Tribunal Federal (Brasil) conoció un asunto en el que un abogado se apoyó en la herramienta de IA MobiOffice y el expediente registró contenido alucinado.

Qué se alucinó

• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Petition cited ARE 1.218.084 AgR as a controlling precedent; the Court was unable to locate the decision invoked, treating it as a fabricated citation.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Petition invoked RE 464.867/SP as a binding precedent; the relator states the decision mentioned was not located and the invocation is misleading/non-existent.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Petition invoked RE 328.111/DF as precedent; the relator reports the decision could not be located as cited by the petitioner.
• Tergiversación de norma legal. Petition attributed to Súmula Vinculante nº 6 the wording that penal acquittal for nonexistence of the fact prevents an administrative sanction; the Court found that the petition's quoted wording is false and provided the actual text of SV6, which concerns military remuneration.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Petition mischaracterized RE 226.855/RS as supporting the claimed rule; the Court notes that RE 226.855/RS actually dealt with FGTS correction (Bresser/Verão/Collor plans), not the effects of penal acquittal asserted by the petitioner.

Desenlace

Reclamação found manifestly unfounded; bad faith and monetary sanction (double court costs); OAB and OAB/BA to be notified. Sanción económica: 1. Sanción profesional: Yes.

Ficha del caso

Fuentes: aporte de /documents/758/8E03AC1BCB6B0B_downloadPeca2.pdf; base de datos de Damien Charlotin.

¿Conoces un caso que falte, o uno colombiano que debamos cubrir a fondo? Escríbenos.