Safe Choice, LLC v. City of Cleveland

Ficha del Equipo Editorial a partir de la base mundial AI Hallucination Cases de Damien Charlotin. Verifica siempre en la fuente original.

El 30 de octubre de 2025, N.D. Ohio (Estados Unidos) conoció un asunto en el que un abogado se apoyó en la herramienta de IA Amicus (Casemine) y el expediente registró contenido alucinado.

Qué se alucinó

• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Attorney attributed the phrase 'fresh injury' to Kuhnle; court found the Sixth Circuit never used that phrase and deemed the citation misrepresented.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Court could not locate this opinion; counsel conceded she could not find or certify its existence.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Court could not locate this opinion; counsel conceded she could not find or certify its existence.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Attorney claimed Jackson supports a 'custom of tolerance' Monell theory; court found Jackson addressed official policy and failure-to-train theories, not the theory advanced.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Attorney represented Burgess as finding failure to respond could amount to ratification; court noted Burgess held after-the-fact approval insufficient to establish Monell claim.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Attorney cited Huffman for a proposition about conspiracy; court observed the word 'conspiracy' does not appear in Huffman and the proposition was inaccurate.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Attorney claimed Doe v. Claiborne County supports that punitive damages cannot be dismissed at pleading stage; court found 'punitive' does not appear in the opinion.
• Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. Attorney cited Conley and Doe v. Columbia Univ. for a broad proposition about damages demands at pleading stage; court found those authorities did not support the asserted proposition.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Court could not locate this opinion; counsel conceded she could not find or certify its existence.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Court could not locate this opinion; counsel conceded she could not find or certify its existence.

Desenlace

Monetary Sanction; Referral to the Bar; Order to serve decision on clinet;. Sanción económica: 7500 USD. Sanción profesional: No.

Ficha del caso

Fuentes: aporte de /documents/961/Safe_Choice_v._City_of_Cleveland_USA_30_October_2025.pdf; base de datos de Damien Charlotin.

¿Conoces un caso que falte, o uno colombiano que debamos cubrir a fondo? Escríbenos.