USA v. Brewer
M.D. Florida · Estados Unidos, 11 de septiembre de 2025 · Información desactualizada. Ficha verificada del Equipo Editorial.
Ficha del Equipo Editorial a partir de la base mundial AI Hallucination Cases de Damien Charlotin. Verifica siempre en la fuente original.
El 11 de septiembre de 2025, M.D. Florida (Estados Unidos) conoció un asunto en el que un abogado se apoyó en una herramienta de IA generativa (no identificada en la decisión) y el expediente registró contenido alucinado.
Qué se alucinó
- Información desactualizada de jurisprudencia revocada. United States v. Mmahat was cited for broad discoverability of probation files but the decision was abrogated and unrelated to revocation proceedings; subsequent history not cited.
- Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Quoted language attributed to United States v. Frazier does not appear in that decision and the case is unrelated to supervised release.
- Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Brady quotation omitted the words "upon request," altering its meaning.
- Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Quoted language attributed to United States v. Hasting does not appear in the opinion (similar language appears only in a concurrence).
- Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. United States v. Bundy was cited for authority to order discovery beyond Rule 32.1, but the cited opinion does not address Rule 32.1, probation, or supervised release.
- Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. United States v. Price cited for a proposition about phone records, but the decision does not concern telephone records.
- Fabricación de jurisprudencia. United States v. Noel (708 F.3d 245, 254 (1st Cir. 2013)) is entirely fabricated and does not exist as cited.
- Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. Quoted sentence attributed to United States v. Safavian does not appear in that opinion.
- Tergiversación de jurisprudencia. United States v. Siddiqui does not support the proposition that computer audit logs are discoverable for timing/access; the citation was misused.
- Fabricación de jurisprudencia. United States v. Hernandez (183 F. Supp. 3d 468, 480 (S.D.N.Y. 2016)) is entirely fabricated according to the court.
Desenlace
Show Cause Order. Sanción profesional: No.
Ficha del caso
| Caso | USA v. Brewer |
| Jurisdicción | M.D. Florida |
| País | Estados Unidos |
| Fecha | 11 de septiembre de 2025 |
| Quién usó IA | Lawyer |
| Herramienta | Implied |
| Área del derecho | criminal |
Fuentes: aporte de /documents/786/UNITED_STATES_OF_AMERICA_v_BRYAN_L_BREWER.pdf; base de datos de Damien Charlotin.
¿Conoces un caso que falte, o uno colombiano que debamos cubrir a fondo? Escríbenos.