Valu v. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs

Ficha del Equipo Editorial a partir de la base mundial AI Hallucination Cases de Damien Charlotin. Verifica siempre en la fuente original.

El 31 de enero de 2025, (Australia) conoció un asunto en el que un abogado se apoyó en la herramienta de IA ChatGPT y el expediente registró contenido alucinado.

Qué se alucinó

• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Applicant's submissions cited 'Murray v Luton [2001] FCA 1245'; Minister and Court confirmed no such decision exists; Court staff spent time unsuccessfully searching.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Applicant's submissions cited 'Mackinlay v MIMA [2002] FCA 953'; Minister and Court confirmed no such decision exists; Court staff expended time attempting to locate it.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Applicant's submissions cited 'Bavinton v MIMA [2017] FCA 712'; Minister and Court confirmed no such decision exists.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Applicant's submissions cited 'Gonzalez v MIBP [2018] FCA 211'; Minister and Court confirmed no such decision exists.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Applicant's submissions cited 'Seng v MIAC [2013] FCA 1279'; Minister and Court confirmed no such decision exists.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Applicant's submissions cited 'Kahawita v MIEA [1993] FCA 870'; Minister and Court confirmed no such decision exists.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Applicant's submissions cited 'MIAC v Thiyagarajah [2016] FCA 19'; Minister and Court confirmed no such decision exists; Court noted time spent searching for purported authority.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Applicant's submissions cited 'Heath v MIMA [2001] FCA 700'; Minister and Court confirmed no such decision exists.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Applicant's submissions cited 'Mitsubishi Motors Australia Ltd v AAT [2004] FCA 1241'; Minister and Court confirmed no such decision exists.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Applicant's submissions cited 'MIMA v Ameer [2004] FCA 276'; Minister and Court confirmed no such decision exists.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Applicant's submissions cited 'Woods v MIMA [2001] FCA 294'; Minister and Court confirmed no such decision exists.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Applicant's submissions cited 'MIAC v Wu [2015] FCA 632'; Minister and Court confirmed no such decision exists.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Applicant's submissions cited 'Drummond v MIMA [2008] FCA 1774'; Minister and Court confirmed no such decision exists.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Applicant's submissions cited 'Walters v MIBP [2016] FCA 953'; Minister and Court confirmed no such decision exists.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Applicant's submissions cited 'Lao v MIMA [2002] FCA 1234'; Minister and Court confirmed no such decision exists.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Applicant's submissions cited 'Alfaro v MIBP [2016] FCA 1156'; Minister and Court confirmed no such decision exists.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. Applicant's submissions cited 'Wai v MIBP [2016] FCA 1157'; Minister and Court confirmed no such decision exists.
• Citas falsas de pruebas o escritos. Para 1.2 of applicant's submissions contained an alleged quote from the Tribunal’s 18 June 2020 decision; Minister and Court confirmed no such passage exists in the decision.
• Citas falsas de pruebas o escritos. Para 2.2 of applicant's submissions contained an alleged quote from the Tribunal’s 18 June 2020 decision; Minister and Court confirmed no such passage exists.
• Citas falsas de pruebas o escritos. Para 3.1 of applicant's submissions contained an alleged quote from the Tribunal’s 18 June 2020 decision; Minister and Court confirmed no such passage exists.
• Citas falsas de pruebas o escritos. Para 4.1 of applicant's submissions contained an alleged quote from the Tribunal’s 18 June 2020 decision; Minister and Court confirmed no such passage exists.
• Citas falsas de pruebas o escritos. Para 5.1 of applicant's submissions contained an alleged quote from the Tribunal’s 18 June 2020 decision; Minister and Court confirmed no such passage exists.
• Citas falsas de pruebas o escritos. Para 5.2 of applicant's submissions contained an alleged quote from the Tribunal’s 18 June 2020 decision; Minister and Court confirmed no such passage exists.
• Citas falsas de pruebas o escritos. Para 6.1 of applicant's submissions contained an alleged quote from the Tribunal’s 18 June 2020 decision; Minister and Court confirmed no such passage exists.
• Citas falsas de pruebas o escritos. Para 6.2 of applicant's submissions contained an alleged quote from the Tribunal’s 18 June 2020 decision; Minister and Court confirmed no such passage exists.

Desenlace

Referral to Legal Services Commissioner. Sanción profesional: Yes.

Ficha del caso

Fuentes: aporte de /documents/430/Valu_v._Minister_for_Immigration_and_Multicultural_Affairs_Australia_31_January_2025.pdf; base de datos de Damien Charlotin.

¿Conoces un caso que falte, o uno colombiano que debamos cubrir a fondo? Escríbenos.