Vita Law Offices v. Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P.

Ficha del Equipo Editorial a partir de la base mundial AI Hallucination Cases de Damien Charlotin. Verifica siempre en la fuente original.

El 23 de julio de 2025, S.D. Florida (Estados Unidos) conoció un asunto en el que un abogado se apoyó en la herramienta de IA Copilot y el expediente registró contenido alucinado.

Qué se alucinó

• Citas falsas de jurisprudencia. "Plaintiff states that “[d]iversity jurisdiction is a federal question, and Carden explicitly rejected state-law classifications, stating that ‘the relevant inquiry is not whether state law recognizes a particular individual as a partner, but rather whether that individual is a member of the unincorporated association for purposes of federal jurisdiction.’” Dkt. 20 at 5. The next sentence in Plaintiff’s brief contains yet another fabricated quote, also attributed to Carden: “The Court warned that allowing state-law distinctions would invite ‘litigation-driven reassessments of an entity’s internal structure.’” Id. (ostensibly quoting Carden, 494 U.S. at 197)"

Desenlace

Order to undergo CLE. Sanción profesional: No.

Ficha del caso

Fuentes: aporte de https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71064385/vita-law-offices-pc-v-lockridge-grindal-nauen-pllp/; base de datos de Damien Charlotin.

¿Conoces un caso que falte, o uno colombiano que debamos cubrir a fondo? Escríbenos.