Wadsworth v. Walmart (Morgan & Morgan)

Ficha del Equipo Editorial a partir de la base mundial AI Hallucination Cases de Damien Charlotin. Verifica siempre en la fuente original.

El 24 de febrero de 2025, Wyoming (Estados Unidos) conoció un asunto en el que un abogado se apoyó en la herramienta de IA Internal tool (ChatGPT) y el expediente registró contenido alucinado.

Qué se alucinó

• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. One of eight non-existent case citations in Plaintiffs' January 22, 2025 Motions in Limine; the Court confirmed it did not exist and deemed reliance on a fake opinion a Rule 11(b)(2) violation.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. One of eight non-existent case citations in Plaintiffs' January 22, 2025 Motions in Limine; the Court confirmed it did not exist and deemed reliance on a fake opinion a Rule 11(b)(2) violation.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. One of eight non-existent case citations in Plaintiffs' January 22, 2025 Motions in Limine; the Court confirmed it did not exist and deemed reliance on a fake opinion a Rule 11(b)(2) violation.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. One of eight non-existent case citations in Plaintiffs' January 22, 2025 Motions in Limine; the Court confirmed it did not exist and deemed reliance on a fake opinion a Rule 11(b)(2) violation.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. One of eight non-existent case citations in Plaintiffs' January 22, 2025 Motions in Limine; the Court confirmed it did not exist and deemed reliance on a fake opinion a Rule 11(b)(2) violation.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. One of eight non-existent case citations in Plaintiffs' January 22, 2025 Motions in Limine; the Court confirmed it did not exist and deemed reliance on a fake opinion a Rule 11(b)(2) violation.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. One of eight non-existent case citations in Plaintiffs' January 22, 2025 Motions in Limine; the Court confirmed it did not exist and deemed reliance on a fake opinion a Rule 11(b)(2) violation.
• Fabricación de jurisprudencia. One of eight non-existent case citations in Plaintiffs' January 22, 2025 Motions in Limine; the Court confirmed it did not exist and deemed reliance on a fake opinion a Rule 11(b)(2) violation.

Desenlace

$3k Fine + Pro Hac Vice Revoked (Drafter); $1k Fine each (Signers); Remedial actions noted.. Sanción económica: 5000 USD. Sanción profesional: No.

Ficha del caso

Fuentes: aporte de https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.wyd.64014/gov.uscourts.wyd.64014.181.0_1.pdf; base de datos de Damien Charlotin.

¿Conoces un caso que falte, o uno colombiano que debamos cubrir a fondo? Escríbenos.