How we build this database

This database gathers court cases worldwide where an artificial intelligence fabricated case law, citations or doctrine and someone filed them before a court. Here is how we build and maintain it — transparently, because a source that does not explain its method does not deserve to be cited.

The source

The data core comes from the global AI Hallucination Cases database maintained by researcher Damien Charlotin (damiencharlotin.com), reused with attribution.

What we add

We systematize each case in Spanish (court, country, date, party, AI tool, what was hallucinated, outcome, sanction and a link to the original decision), build one record per case, update the base daily and review it editorially.

Verification and limits

We invent nothing: if a fact is not confirmed, it is flagged or omitted. This database is for research and information and does not constitute legal advice.

Data based on AI Hallucination Cases by Damien Charlotin, reused with attribution (CC BY 4.0). Spanish version: Metodología.